Kolkata Suburban Railway, Lucknow MEMU, MMTS Hyderabad and Mumbai Suburban Railway should "not" be listed as "metros," as KCR above. Hong Kong: Kowloon-Canton Railway should "not" be listed as "metros," but as "regional rail." Yes, there are good reasons why this system might be listed as a "metro" - but to do so would logically require similar listing for a number of Japanese rail systems. Johannesburg/Pretoria will be "regional rail." Gautrain will not be a "metro." Good to have a link from this page, however - as with the following. Or something else, such as "Start of construction postponed" (e.g. New York) or a very brief comment: "Under consruction," "Construction authorized," "In planning" or "Under discussion." Parsing the headings: Under "year opened, there should be either a year, a year with footnote (e.g.
![stockholm train systemname stockholm train systemname](http://esct2019.storage.googleapis.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/SPARVAG-1-1024x576.jpg)
So: is "light metro" a subset of "metro" or "light rail transit" ?Ī good way to answer this question - and also to distinguish between LRT and "other modes" - is to consider whether the vehicles are in theory compatible with operation in streets - today. The Los Angeles LRT Green Line is another example of a "light metro" (although its stations are "very" widely spaced.) Louis LRT system had all the characteristics listed above until it was expanded from its "original. and Canadian metro lines are spaced much farther apart than on most European and Asian ones.Īnd yes, there is a "light metro" system in the U.S. Stations tend to be more closely-spaced than on a "full-sized" metro - but stations on most U.S. A "light metro" might have several km of tunnels and several underground stations.
#Stockholm train systemname how to#
We will need to recognize and decide how to categorize something called "light metro." This is not at all the same thing as "small-profile metro." (London and New York have "large-profile" and "small-profile" metro lines "large-profile" metro stock is "almost" as large as railway stock, while "small-profile" stock is narrower and shorter.) Basically, "light metro" implies tram-type or light-rail type vehicles, relatively short trains (2-4 cars maximum) - but no street track, and full separation (that is, no level crossings). But anyone who believes that we can blithely ignore certain "issues" that do not occur in the "English speaking world" would do well to consider the following. (I'll also note that the fact that "Mass Transit" redirects to the "Rapid transit" page suggests significant confusion about public transport terminology.) "Rapid transit" was selected for the sake of "neutrality" - but it is nonetheless a rather flagrant "Americanism." It is not really a synonym for "metro" - and its use also opens the door for inclusion of "non-rail" modes (e.g. I'm aware of the ongoing debate over nomenclature on the main "rapid transit" page. This list should probably be titled "List of metro systems" - because "metro" is the most commonly-used term worldwide.
![stockholm train systemname stockholm train systemname](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/j-XuoN_0cc0/maxresdefault.jpg)
I think we should put our "consensus energy" into deciding what system belongs where, rather than attempting to cobble together "all-inclusive" definitions.īecause this list will remain the "primary" reference for many people whose first language is something other than English, I think that certain "Americanisms" should be avoided (e.g. Each system should be listed once, on only one list, with a "reference link" for "borderline" cases. The lists above should not contain duplicate entries. An "airport peoplemover" would be an example of "intramural" transport. There also needs to be a distinction between "public" and "intramural" passenger transport. Suburban and commuter rail (or "regional rail") systems Automated Guideway Transport (AGT) systems
![stockholm train systemname stockholm train systemname](https://cdn.w600.comps.canstockphoto.com/stockholm-sweden-may-30-train-picture_csp25476911.jpg)
I think there should be - and that we can make, by consensus - reasonable distinctions between the following types of "fixed-track" or "fixed-rail" public passenger transport: ), I am NOT willing to play the part of "NSDAP Member" when it comes to improving this list. Unlike certain Wikipedia editors (and at least one editor. 39 Edmonton, Calgary and Ottawa LRT systems in Canada.38 Please remove Antwerp from the Belgium section.30 Rapid transit in Dallas Fort Worth area.28 Total rapid transit systems statistics by country.14 Possible rapid transit systems in Stockholm.12 Paris RER, Berlin and Hamburg S-Bahn, Copenhagen S-Train.11 Wrong numbers for Madrid and Barcelona and probably a lot of other.3 Why the title "should" be "List of metro systems".